The peer review process is a rigorous, unbiased and constructive process of blind expert evaluation of manuscripts. Reviewers should not seek to identify the authors they are reviewing nor should they identify themselves. If the invited reviewer perceives to have a potential conflict of interest, they should immediately notify the editors.
The reviewers are asked to follow the general COMSt Bulletin Ethics guidelines
It may also be useful for reviewers to consult the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) ‘Cope Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers’.
The evaluation form has been designed to assist the reviewers in their work.
Data Privacy Statement
This web site respects the data privacy rules of the Universität Hamburg.